up:: Finitely Generated Vector Space
Let
We seek to prove that, by adequate arrangements, exchanges of vectors of
with vectors from still make the new set a spanning set, since each vector removed can be seen as the linear combination of the remainder of the vectors (thus, “no information is lost”).
Proof by Induction: removing a vector from
: is Linearly Dependent and spans . Since A set is linearly dependent iff there is a vector which is a linear combination of previous vectors, then we can rearrange the new set and remove some vector from such that this union still spans ─ say, removing 1 ─ yielding . : Suppose that is still a spanning set, after having swapped vectors from for vectors from (provided adequate arrangements). Since it spans , then we have that, in particular,
Note that we must have some
Thus,
At the end, we’ll have the set
Thus we must have that
Corollaries
- All Hamel bases have the same number of elements (in a finitely generated vector space)
- Sets larger than a finitely generated space’s bases are linearly dependent
- Any linearly independent set can be extended to a Hamel basis
References
- linear algebra - Prove that cardinality of linearly independent set is less than or equal to spanning set - Mathematics Stack Exchange
- linear algebra - The length of every linearly independent list of vectors is less than or equal to the length of every spanning list of vectors. - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Footnotes
-
This works since
will be substituted by the span of the remaining vectors ─ and, thus, this new set will still span the entire set, just with instead of with . ↩ -
And we have that A set is linearly independent iff all its finite subsets are also L.I.. ↩